Oct 23 2009
Posted by Rockefellerin Left Wing
I’m not gonna lie, as much as I love Alan Grayson (a man who’s name I forgot, then remembered again once I Googled “Democrat with balls”), I have to say that Al Franken is probably my favorite Congressman working today. Back during the Minnesota runoff, I couldn’t really give a shit about who won, Franken or the other guy. I just thought he was some rather unfunny comedian, trying to get more famous by being in Congress.
Wrong.
Since his election, Franken has shown a true commitment to democracy, and especially the issue of health care, as you can see in this video. I think he and Grayson are tied for the number of videos I’ve posted of them on this site, but Franken talking down a crowd of angry protesters has to be one of my favorites so far, I’ve reposted that after the jump.
And there’s always this….

| Share |
44 Responses to AL FRANKEN TEARS THROUGH A HEALTH CARE OPPONENT LIKE BUTTER
sam
October 23rd, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Al Franken criticizes her for cherry picking, while he does the same thing.
Jon
October 23rd, 2009 at 4:53 pm
Uhh he’s a senator, not a congressman, but anyways…
d
October 23rd, 2009 at 5:00 pm
“I have to say that Al Franken is probably my favorite Congressman working today”
There IS A DIFFERENCE between a Congressman and a Senator. Al is a Senator….
Daniel Henderson
October 23rd, 2009 at 7:34 pm
I didn’t know healthcare was a facet of democracy. “Franken has shown a true commitment to democracy, and especially the issue of health care…”. It would be a non sequitur to say “I love baseball, and especially Ubuntu.” The author is definitely linking one as an important component of the other. It is not, though. Helping other people voluntarily is charity; helping them by mandate of government is socialism. Why is there no push to make government-run groceries? A person will suffer and die much sooner without food than without healthcare. My position is that people should care for themselves, choose which things are their priorities, and let a free market manage prices.
John M
October 23rd, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Switzerland? Nice choice, Franken. The Swiss is a pretty frickin rich country, and not because of Socialism…
Switzerland also has one of the highest gun ownership rates in the world, and any citizen that has served in the Swiss military is required to possess a gun at the home. Just an FYI…
Telgard
October 23rd, 2009 at 11:29 pm
Haha at Daniel Henderson and his attachment to SHTICK narratives. Some want to mandate health insurance. Why? Million dollar question, but Daniel didn’t consider it.
It turns out, we *already* have a mandate–for universal care… If you’re sick or hurt and you are uninsured, the Emergency Rooms cannot turn you down. Taxpayers foot the bill for your costs. Is it tyranny to day that we will control this problem from the front end, by having everyone buy insurance?
Well, Daniel, we already mandate car insurance for everyone who has a car. Why can’t we mandate health insurance for everyone who has a body?
Make sure you extrapolate and think things out before you respond to me, I’m not going to walk you through much more of this. What’s it like to vote the same way as the trailer parks?
Darell
October 24th, 2009 at 12:21 am
Umm congressman is the general broad term used when describing or combining a description of both senators and representatives.
The United States Congress consists of both the SENATE and the HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
Therefore anyone who is a senator can be referred to as a congressman.
Get it together, folks
datora
October 24th, 2009 at 12:51 am
“Back during the Minnesota runoff, I couldn’t really give a shit about who won, Franken or the other guy.”
Seriously ..? Rocky, you are far to ignorant to be posting about politics. You only completely missed about a decade and a half of Franken. No. Really. For you to have been ignorant of Franken prior to the Minnesota race means you are completely disqualified from commenting in a any credible fashion about U.S. politics.
Poseur.
Adam W
October 24th, 2009 at 2:32 am
John, how is that relevant at all? People looking for a way to fit “socialism” into their arguement are just trying to scare people away from reading facts and making educated decisions about health care reform. Do you cry socialism at many of the other government run aspects of our everyday lives? When you wake up and watch the fcc approved broadcast, drink your fda approved coffee, drive your environmentally regulated automobile to work, work a day under federal regulated labor laws, drive home to your wife that you had to legally marry, and mail your health care bill via the united states postal service, do you condemn the government for being socialist and wish they’d stay out of your business?
Federal regulated health care HAS to happen. We can’t afford it as a nation, it is crippling us. Did you listen to the numbers he read off? I’ll admit i didn’t research it, but even if any people at all are going bankrupt from medical bills WHEN THEY HAVE health insurance is appalling. The free market system is clearly working very poorly and without reform we’ll see yet another crash like the real estate fiasco.
Set aside your personal opinion and realize that while things may change for you with health care reform, the nation will suffer dramatically without it.
peter
October 24th, 2009 at 3:00 am
Congressman: “term (congress) technically applies to members of both the upper house Senate and the lower House of Representatives. “Congress” technically refers to both houses.”
James S
October 24th, 2009 at 3:25 am
I’m from Europe. Switzerland is like most other country here. He didn’t just say Switzerland – he mentioned France and Germany too. He could have gone on to say England, Italy, Spain and carried on for ages. The debate was about “going bankrupt” not about cancer – so he’s not cherry picking he’s sticking to the point. The idea you go bankrupt to fund your healthcare is a valid point.
Judy N
October 24th, 2009 at 3:41 am
John M…..he also mentioned Germany and France. He could have also brought up Italy. Because countries with single-payer systems do not force citizens into bankruptcy. Duh.
Mr. Henderson….the health insurance market is not a free market – it is generally one dominated by large companies with monopolies in each state. To insure millions of people it is necessary for that entity to be large in order to spread the risk.
That’s why managing health care programs is best done by the government and why the cost is so much lower….no marketing expenses, no profit margin/shareholder concerns.
All a health insurance company does is push paper and deny claims to boost profits. They offer no other value at all. I don’t understand trying to protect this middle-man industry that offers nothing in return for the money they make. Especially over the physical and financial health of the citizens of this nation. That’s kind of sick.
Health care and insurance should be an equal right for all Americans not based on who can afford it and who can’t. It’s called “Promoting The General Welfare” of the citizenry.
G K
October 24th, 2009 at 3:45 am
The point being made is that the health care system the US is using right now is too expensive and not efficient. Moving to a more socialist health care system will improve the overall health of the population while improving infrastructure, creating jobs, and reducing costs. Why are the american people against that?!
Tegan
October 24th, 2009 at 4:04 am
Re: “Switzerland also has one of the highest gun ownership rates in the world.”
So…? I think it’s more about what you’re doing with your guns than simply owning one. But what does this point have to do with healthcare at all?
I’m Canadian, and I wouldn’t give up my healthcare system for anything. If the government wanted to privatize the system THEN I’d take to the streets.
Rich Irwin
October 24th, 2009 at 4:07 am
Actual, Congress is composed of the House (which has Representatives) and the Senate (which has Senators).
They are all congressmen.
Some congressmen are Senators.
Some congressmen are Representatives.
Brett F
October 24th, 2009 at 4:21 am
“Helping other people voluntarily is charity; helping them by mandate of government is socialism. Why is there no push to make government-run groceries?”
I don’t mean to pick on you here Daniel but what you said there really doesn’t make any sense. If you wanted to build the US on that notion then police would become privately owned security contracters, the fire department would charge you to put out fires and schools would be run for profit. Every service that is provided by the government is essentially “socialist”, yet because these services have been around for so long no one questions them. You don’t hear anyone saying they want to privatise the local library; it would just be considered absurd. You pay taxes for all of these essentially socialist facilities, but having free (or rather tax based) simple healthcare is considered crazy. What’s crazy is being a the only 1st world country in the world to not have universal health care (even Saudi Arabia has universal health care!)
scott sampleton
October 24th, 2009 at 4:53 am
Congress = House of Representatives + Senate
Member of the House = Representative, or Congressman
Member of the senate= Senator or Congressman
It’s sure nice to be snarky, it’s even better when you’re right about.
Josh
October 24th, 2009 at 5:01 am
It wasn’t a runoff, it was a recount. The runoff was in another (southern) state, I think Georgia.
Salem S
October 24th, 2009 at 5:27 am
@John M,
Great point! Switzerland is super rich from capitalism while stil providing universal healthcare. Great example of how a country can provide universal healthcare while not becoming socialist. Realy great observation, thank you.
Mike
October 24th, 2009 at 5:31 am
How can anyone argue with negotiating drug prices, regulating insurance companies and reducing health care costs through preventive medicine? Only those who are bought out by the people representing the corporations. Wake up “tea party” people you have been duped.
brad
October 24th, 2009 at 5:36 am
@Daniel
Correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s what started this problem in the first place. Big corporations only get bigger while the little guys can’t compete, resulting in exorbitant prices. Also, the quote is not an example of a non-sequitur, because though it’s not an aspect ingrained into democracy, it’s one of high importance and priority nationwide currently. And about the gov’t groceries…uh…I’m pretty sure no one will go bankrupt and die trying to get food this week. Oh, and food stamps and WIC exist, so hey, maybe they already took up that avenue. And all those people you think should care for themselves? I’m willing to bet that most of them DID, only to get dumped by their insurance provider when anything potentially expensive to the company happened to them. So we’ve seen how that road works, and it just doesn’t work correctly. And since you’re so against socialism, I guess you wouldn’t mind having your right to public school, the police force, America’s Army, public libraries, fire fighters, and more revoked, correct? After all, why should I have to pay to put out your house fire? If you can’t take care of yourself, you should lay down and burn!
Frank B
October 24th, 2009 at 5:38 am
@John M -
Um, what does gun ownership in Switzerland have to do with…anything?
@Daniel Henderson
I don’t hear anyone who is on medicare complaining about socialism, do you?
Tom
October 24th, 2009 at 6:48 am
Senators and Representatives are both Congressman. Both members of the two houses are part of the Congress, that makes them all congressmen.
BK
October 24th, 2009 at 6:50 am
a Congressman is someone who is a member of Congress. For those of you that took Civics classes in High School, Congress is made up of the Senate and House of Representatives. Thus, Al Franken is a Congressman.
Switzerland is a nice choice because it is now the most capitalistic country in the world (http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/09/us_loses_top_competitive_ranking_to_switzerland.php), and have recently had a health care overhaul that offers universal coverage without any government run programs.
Matt
October 24th, 2009 at 6:52 am
@sam – what did he cherry pick? entire countries? I think cherry picking is selecting a small part of a larger whole, ignoring other facts to make your point. Franken is using entire countries to make his point, it would be more like cherry picking if he said, well when dealing with medical bills related to car accidents their bankruptcy rate is 0.
@daniel – the free market has already proved itself horribly flawed when it comes to health care, and if you think the food you’re buying at the grocery store isn’t already regulated before it gets there you’re insane. Government run health care or mandated health care is no more socialism then a government run police force that keeps you safe.
@John – this is so weirdly flawed I don’t know how to argue it, the swiss ARE a rich country and it’s not due to socialism, it’s because they are a tiny country with a well regulated government and economy and for the most part have not taken major parts in any wars (which tend to send economies into a downward spiral). The point Franken made is that their healthcare system works, which it does, which either you’re agreeing with or had no idea how to refute.
Point being, if all of you think that health care reform is unneeded, then you’ve either never had to deal with the health care industry or you’re to young to know a difference. There’s a reason the health care lobbyists have dumped more money into lobbying recently then any other industry, and it’s not because the system works so well that they have no worries, its because the system is screwed in their favor making them billions and they’d like to see that continue for obvious reasons. Government regulation isn’t bad, and it doesn’t mean we’re socialists, I’m pretty sure there isn’t a bill out there to take over Best Buy and to force you to split all your groceries with your neighbor, so maybe we calm down a bit and do some smart thinking on a topic that is affecting millions in this country instead of making crazy accusations not based on fact that have little to do with the argument on hand.
Dude
October 24th, 2009 at 7:20 am
I think Franken confuses Sweden with Switzerland. Well, it’s not always easy:
http://www.funtrivia.com/playquiz/quiz21806918f80e0.html
I had problems answering all questions of the quiz and I am Swedish
Geoff
October 24th, 2009 at 7:25 am
@John M: “Switzerland had a homicide rate of 1.2 per 100,000 [and] a robbery rate of 36 per 100,000. Almost half of these criminal acts were committed by non-resident foreigners.
In the United States, the homicide rate was almost 9.0 (70% involving firearms), and the robbery rate 234, per 100,000.” (Source: http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/articles/guns-crime-swiss.html )
Statistics and studies prove time and again that America has a gun problem. See http://www.guncontrol.ca/English/Home/Releases/GlobalGunEpidemicRev07.pdf for example. It’s time for you Americans to stop making fools of yourselves and pay attention to your own problems, not cite the lack of problems elsewhere as evidence that you can be trusted with a gun as much as the Swiss.
Gary B
October 24th, 2009 at 7:49 am
As a Canadian – I see no rational reason to socialize schools, fire, police and military but not socialize health care. These are areas that we think are sufficiently important that the private sector is not allowed sole domain, as it could not scale appropriately, nor cost effectively. Unless you are rich why would you not want a socialist system?
egeshegava
October 24th, 2009 at 8:07 am
Franken is one of the “menaces” (besides being brain dead and illiterate like the majority of diggers).
Read on If You Have Intelligence!
The youth-felons (14-18) I teach in an S-4 High Security prison for the most part despise their previous public school education from which they all dropped out, many as early as the 6th-7th grades. They hate the coiled exhibitionist in Putz Obama, and delegate him a weird Uncle Tom status in their inner city hoods. He has no place, less than their fathers who most boys wish dead, and would gladly comply with their own wishes if they had access or reason to find their makers. Sharpton, Jackson, the flamboyent crop of liberal preachers mean nothing to these young men whom I’m honored to reach with an ABE and GED curricula. Obama is the last in a line of false preachers filled with Democratic crumbled dreams that filled their disillusioned mothers’ wishes, but came to nought in their mothers and grandmothers’ lives. At the PPTs in prison you’ll see these pathetic women, and I mean that with sincere sadness, as they are bleached by heartsick love for their teenage sons thrown into jail often for 2+ years, who “wouldn’t listen to me,” and I want to tell them how bottomless is their uncontainable anger for white and black societies for they know Obama will do NOTHING to avail them, but their mothers and their grandmothers know that even more strongly. I’m amazed when 1 out of 10 will read a textbook with independent passion, for the other 9 will fight and resist and try every trick that worked in their failing public schools which they all still dispise, even 3 or more years after dropping-out. Every one is a hooked 700 lb. tuna on 100 lb. testline and the fight between teacher and student is a classic struggle for days, weeks, and months, until he leaves or gives-in in most prison schools. They sense Obama is the primal lie, and I’ve asked them to explain: It comes down to the Democratic vision transplanted of living deeply wounded in spirit, instead of rising from the vacuous well, they hold firm to the bottom edges and tred water, the slime Obama-Jackson throws into the well. When they leave prison they go back to the “MENACE” or jungle; where else is there after the half-way program which never conclusively point a way out of the jungle. Their lives are fears instilled by the Dodds, Kennedys, Obamas, etc. now generations old and responsible all the more who never spent 10 minutes as an educator in 1 Level 4 juvy-prison because (I’ve always wanted to tell some of the students, but never have of course)…to the Democrats, these boys in prison are testtube specimens, and as alien to Obama and Michelle as a Chopin waltz, or carbonic acid, or a gibous moon
Free Ad Posting
October 24th, 2009 at 8:12 am
Government do provide foods for the hungry in the form of food stamps. Helping people by a Government mandate is socialism. So, SCHIP is socialism. Medicare is socialism. Social Security is socialism. 401K is socialism. Tax cuts to people who makes millions is socialism. If every time Government policy designed to help a group of people is socialism, then we’re already socialist. From the moment you wake up to the time you go to bed, Government is already helping you. The breakfast you eat in the morning is regulated by the USDA, the road you you drive, the plane you take, the office or factory you work, the radio you listen to, the TV you watch, the school you send your kids to, the topys your kids play with, every thing is already regulated by the Government.
matt
October 24th, 2009 at 8:26 am
you thought al franken was just an unfunny comedian before he ran? did you pay attention to any of his books or interactions with bill oreillly? the man has been sticking it the limbaugh, oreilly and the idiotic right with for years.
Tan
October 24th, 2009 at 8:29 am
@Daniel
Why is there no push to make government-run groceries?
Gov’t programs like food stamps and gov’t assisted food banks seem to fall under that category of helping people eat so they don’t starve. Maybe there is no push now, since something is there in place today to address that need. People do go hungry here in the states, but let’s be real, we’re not Ethiopia where there is a crisis….if anything we have an obesity crisis from the abundance of relatively cheap food (fast fried foods) – my friend who is a orthopedic surgeon is doing great these days with all the diabetics that come in (not genetic, but of the obesity onset variety) that are in need of foot amputations due to the diabetes destroying their extremities…dialysis business is healthy for the same reasons….excuse my digression on us Americans being ‘fattys’, but that’s probably a problem hurting US healthcare today – we (most Americans in general that is) don’t take good care of ourselves. I hear P.E. is now optional at the HS level at many places…wow.
Anyhoot – thought I’d chime in since that question popped out as I was reading the comments.
Brian Kane
October 24th, 2009 at 8:31 am
The difference between myself and someone like Daniel, who posted above, is that i live in a reality where people make the right choices and do the best for themselves and their families and STILL can’t afford insurance. I am willing to help those people with my taxes. The comment that people should just take care of themselves is obviously made from a place of extreme selfishness. I wonder how Daniel would like a world whrre there were no fire departments, unemployment insurance, social security, etc. Would it just be “too bad, take care of yourself. Good luck. ” what it comes down to is that Daniel wants too keep all his money and not help anyone else. Well, that’s selfish, unrealistic and too damn bad for him.
R. Moore
October 24th, 2009 at 8:33 am
Al Franken is a Congress-critter. The Senate is one of two bodies that make up Congress.
Wikipedia: The United States Congress is the bicameral legislature of the federal government of the United States of America, consisting of two houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives.
I *like* what he’s been doing.
Wyatt Junker
October 24th, 2009 at 8:40 am
Franken actually thinks he supposed to play senator. Its proven by how much he loves the sound of his own voice as here in his game of ‘gotcha now bitch, oooh, gonna buuurn’ wannabe lawyer on the playground bullshit.
But the fact is, medicaid already is a 70 trillion dollar deficit run blackhole. How does Pat the lesbian actually think we’re going to pay for it when the CBO has already B-slapped the entire DNC with their false numbers game?
The DNC already did free government housing with Fannie and Freddie and see where that got us. Now they want to do free government booboo and owies too and turn our government into a Band Aid vending machine. I’ll tell you what. That vending machine that we all pay higher and higher taxes into is starting to break and no matter how hard you kick the machine once you put your coin in, it won’t drop any more Ho Ho’s or Zingers.
Oh yeah, as far as Switzerland goes, 70% tax rates to pay for ‘free’ healthcare is a dead horse. Nice try Pat. The entire country almost BK’d just last year. And they don’t have much overhead as a country unlike the US since we’re the damned global cop and have higher military expenses, but I guess if you want us to be like Switzerland, like Pat does, then we don’t have to have a military anymore either and just let the world kind of go wherever it wants to without that hedge. Should be interesting to live in that world of winner take all.
matt
October 24th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Really, jon and d? Nice attempt at nit-picking, but a congressman is anyone in congress, which includes both the house of representatives (what you’re probably thinking of) and the senate. This is 6th grade shit.
Jeff E
October 24th, 2009 at 11:23 am
I think Al Franken makes some good points and is able to answer both legitimate and illogical reasons very well. Certainly he is cherry-picking some countries for their outstanding job at socialized or heavily regulated health care, but shouldn’t that mean we should try our best to replicate those great results? America has always been a melting pot of different cultures, religions, and ideas, so I don’t see why we can’t we use that to our advantage? Let’s figure out what works and doesn’t work with different systems around the world and then develop a great low-cost health care system that benefits from the advantage of other countries’ experience.
CCC
October 24th, 2009 at 11:28 am
Switzerland also has no standing peacetime army. Every male citizen is required to possess a gun at home in order to provide for a prepared militia. This is part of the reason Germany did not invade Switzerland during WWII. And a big reason why the country is as wealthy as it is.
Matt
October 24th, 2009 at 12:17 pm
how come firefighters, and police aren’t socialism? doesn’t the government and tax payers pay their salary’s? isn’t their “mandate” to help people, and save lives? socialism confuses me…. I’m just glad when my house is burning down, putting out the fire isn’t done on a volunteer basis.
Panu H.
October 24th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
John M,
Switzerland is a rich European country, but their healthcare is not going bankrupt because of that. Same thing is true for pretty much all western nations so I don’t care why mentioned socialism at all, or gun ownership etc. I think what you’re getting at is that Switzerland has a few “non socialistic” policies, that means the U.S. should not adopt a “socialistic” health care. Well, that argument is the stupidest I’ve ever heard in the health care debate.
Michael I
October 24th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Yes there uis a difference between congressman and senator. A congressman can be a senator or representative but a senator is only a senator. By definition a congressman is a man of congress. In other words an elected official working in one of the two congressional houses.
Media Mogul
October 24th, 2009 at 11:49 pm
I see that this video was taken back when ‘Medicare fraud’ was a piece of the party line vocabulary. I wonder, from whose mind, or from what primary body of dialog, do these key terms originate? Medicare fraud was shown days later to have little to no impact on the necessity of a new health care bill, in terms of what percentage of “overages” it might have accounted for…but it had to come from somewhere.
M Linardy
October 25th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
“My position is that people should care for themselves, choose which things are their priorities, and let a free market manage prices.”
Some facets of a civilized society should be socialized. Would you like the “free market” to take over our roads and infrastructure? There would be a lot more toll booths. How about the socialized education system? Never hear it referred to as anything but public, probably because socialized is a scary word in the US. How would you like our children’s education to completely optional? You may not mind because you can afford private school. In my opinion our public schools should extend past K-12 to either community, or vocational colleges.
Left, Right, Center…we all agree we need reform. I personally agree with Senator Franken.
ThirstyJon
October 27th, 2009 at 7:47 pm
???????
If you take a small clip from a conversation where one person is making their point that doesn’t qualify as “cutting through like butter.”
“Cherry Picking” is right.
I thought the lady did fine staying cool, calm and collected while Franken played.